Responsive web design is standard today. Developers often face the choice: use a framework like Bootstrap CSS or write custom media queries. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages.
Bootstrap CSS: Advantages
- Quick Start: Many components and layouts are ready to use immediately.
- Consistency: Uniform grid systems and styles reduce design errors.
- Responsiveness: Predefined breakpoints for different screen sizes.
- Community & Support: Large user base, many tutorials and extensions.
- Browser Compatibility: Bootstrap covers many older browser issues.
Bootstrap CSS: Disadvantages
- Size: Many unnecessary styles can bloat the site.
- Individuality: Websites often look similar without extensive customization.
- Learning Curve: Deeper customization requires understanding the system well.
- Overhead: Sometimes classes are used that are irrelevant for the project.
Custom Media Queries: Advantages
- Full Control: Every element and adjustment can be individually designed.
- Performance: Less unnecessary code, faster loading times.
- Flexibility: Breakpoints can be tailored precisely to project requirements.
- Unique Design: No "Bootstrap look", website appears more unique.
Custom Media Queries: Disadvantages
- Workload: Everything must be created and tested from scratch.
- Browser Compatibility: Custom CSS requires careful testing.
- Complexity: Larger projects can quickly become confusing.
Conclusion
Bootstrap CSS is particularly suitable for rapid prototypes, small to medium projects, or teams that need consistent designs. Custom media queries offer maximum control and performance but are more time-consuming. Many developers combine both approaches: Bootstrap as a base and individual adjustments via custom media queries. At aurelix, I use the optimal mix of framework and custom CSS depending on project requirements.
Image: freepik.com